Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Another rant against uninformed voters

Why do we, as a country, condone and promote ignorant voting? Nothing annoys me more than the "Get Out the Vote" movements. Why do we want uninformed voters helping to make important decisions about our country? Why don't we have an "Educate the Vote" campaign? Instead of being so concerned with people voting, we should be promoting knowledge and understanding of the issues that face us. And if people were educated about the issues, they would have more of an incentive to vote. This uninformed voting only leads to these knee-jerk, empty decisions.

I can't tell you how many times I've heard someone who knows nothing about any of the issues, and who couldn't tell an Obama policy from a McCain policy, waxing on about how they plan to vote for one candidate or the other. Although, in California and in my peer group, it definitely is largely Obamaniacs. I have no doubt that the rest of the country has plenty of uninformed McCain supporters.

I just have trouble wrapping my head around the idea that we give free Starbucks to people as an incentive to vote. The people that should be voting are the people who would vote without free coffee, not the people who have to be reminded and prodded.

I'm tired of people expecting a pat on the back for voting when they know NOTHING about the issues. You should get a pat on the back when you LEARN about the issues.

And I am so sick of hearing about how much of a historic election this is. Get over it people. I guarantee that it would not be considered to be such a historic election if the black candidate were on the Republican ticket. And the fact that we are making such a big deal over the color of Obama's skin, just goes to show how far we still have to go, rather than how far we've come. As I see it, this is a step backward, judging a candidate by the color of his skin, rather than on the merits of his record. Heralding a guy, who's party promoted him prematurely because he's a slick speaker and an uber politically correct choice. Never mind that he practically has no experience, poor judgment and is the most leftist candidate of all time. But, I digress.

The point is, people need to start doing their homework. Especially, smart, educated people, who have the time and resources to do such. Put down the People magazine. Turn off American Idol. Educate yourselves! Don't vote based on what someone at the office water cooler says. Learn about the issues. Figure out where you stand and then the choice becomes clear. These candidates stand for such radically different ideals, that it is utterly incomprehensible to me that anyone could have trouble deciding between the two.

And for those of you who don't like either choice, join the club. But you have to work with what you're given and vote for the America that you would rather see. Get involved. Education is the key. Sitting back and B-M-W-ing does nothing. Do something! Make an effort. Educate yourselves and then educate others. Learn about local candidates. And stop voting based on who looks more presidential.

As a side and final note, a very wise friend recently said:
You just described 90% of Obama's voting base. They know absolutely nothing about the issues, and they don't care. It "feels good" to vote for him. Kelly, you could tell them that Obama is going to execute their families and they'd still vote for him. They don't care about facts. Period.

I have a theory---it's a product of our TV/Internet generations, with short-attention spans and a taste only for dessert---nobody eats vegetables anymore (i.e. reading, researching, discussion, analysis, etc.). They only want easy answers (like their favorite TV shows) and simple solutions (like their e-mail splurges and text messaging).
Our society is deteriorating from the inside out...in an similar way that the Roman Empire destroyed itself from inside. As the Romans took over more & more people, tribes, villages, towns, they gradually lost their sense of Nationalism and cohesion. It became more about "me" than "us." The sense for a cause greater than oneself was lost. That is exactly what's happening to us, and Obama is the messiah for those who want handouts, for those with no appreciation for hard-earned success, and for those who want to alleviate their white guilt.

Welcome to the new U.S.A. You can scream, or you can dig into your little corner of the universe and enjoy it as best you can. That's what I'm doing.

It is so true. People vote based on what benefits them, personally, rather than what is best for the country. This short-sighted, me-centric society is the heart of so many of our problems. Look beyond yourselves, people. Try extrapolating a bit. It won't hurt, I promise.

10 comments:

Jefferoo said...

? I don't get it - Obama beat McCain by 18 points among people with post-graduate degrees. Or try the fact that he beat McCain amongst voters making $200,000 or more - the people Obama has pledged to tax. Seems pretty selfless and "Country First" to me. Even if Obama did get a large number of stupid people voting for him - there were nearly the same number of stupid people voting for McCain (I believe the technical term is the 'religious right').

Hope your election night was as good as it could be given the numbers. Tell me you didn't tear up at least once - and not in a bad way, but in the overwhelmed by the moment type of way. Pretty neat stuff. If its any consolation I voted for a Republican for the Senate - he lost, though. On the bright side, ski season is upon us!

Jefferoo said...

Ooh! One more thing - Larry Elder was on a panel on Larry King the other night and I thought of you. One of the panel members was complaining about mailers and phone calls going to voters telling them the election was on Wed. or Thurs. and Elder said anyone who falls for that ploy is too stupid to vote. The panel got mad at him but I absolutely agreed with his point. Maybe I'm not such a bad guy after all. ;-)

Midnight Oil said...

That's exactly my point. It's not necessarily stupid people voting for Obama. But, it is a lot of people who are not following politics or only following them on a superficial level. Just because you have a post-graduate degree or make a lot of money doesn't mean you follow current events or politics. My best friend is a great lawyer and before the last week or so, the closest she's gotten to "news" is "Meet the Khardasians." But, she proudly informed me that she voted for Obama yesterday because she want "change" and to vote for the first black president. As if there could be two more empty reasons to vote for someone. Want to add because he looks so presidential to that list? It scares me when smart people act stupidly.

And if I did tear up, it was only because I'm worried about our country. The only two reasons I'm glad for an Obama presidency are because that means no Hillary presidency in '12 and it makes Jesse Jackson even more irrelevant.

You, however, should start worrying about a Jindal/Palin ticket in 2012.

Midnight Oil said...

And furthermore, education and money should not be equated with intelligence. Not to beat a dead horse, but Joe the Plumber seems to have a very strong grasp of the issues, yet he is "only" a plumber and I would guess that he does not have many advanced degrees.

Jefferoo said...

My point on the money was that these are people who stand to make less money under Obama than McCain and voted for him anyway - voting for the good of the country instead of "me first". I fail to see, however, how an idiot could get a post-graduate degree - on the other hand, you're right, the lack of a degree does not an idiot make. There's plenty of brilliant college drop-outs out there, I count myself one of them ;-)

You're also correct, less Jesse Jackson is good for everyone.

Ted Stevens is still ahead in his senate race, so if he pulls that off then gets kicked out of the senate (as happens to convicted felons) watch Palin appoint herself to fill his seat. Very entertaining. Jindal has been great for Louisiana - and guess where he's heading today? Iowa. Could be very interesting, however, the GOP has a major identity crisis and the map is stacked against them until they get out of the shadow of the evangelical base and move back towards the center.

But that's 2012 - a long way off. Aren't we supposed to have flying cars by then?

Midnight Oil said...

That only proves that those people don't have a real understanding of economics and/or have a blind crush on The Messiah for other reasons. And I'm not saying that people don't want to do what's best for their country. I'm saying they don't understand what that really is.

There are all kinds of different smarts. Book smarts, street smarts, etc. I know quite a few people who had no problem with the very strenuous academics at my college, but just try having a conversation with them. You'll walk away wondering how anyone could be that stupid.

The GOP is having a major identity crisis. And they have some time to get their shit together.

2012 is a long ways off, unfortunately. We may not have flying cars, but I'll bet that we have severe denuding of the grasslands from all the unicorns Obama will be introducing into the states.

Jefferoo said...

Don't worry about the Unicorns, they can be shot from helicopters with great ease. They're also quite tasty with a little leprechaun chutney and a dash of pixie dust.

I like how assertive you are about a "real understanding of economics" - similar to Palin's "real America" comments. Did it ever cross your mind that, perhaps, trickle down doesn't work and building the economy from the middle class up might be a better idea? There are plenty of people with a "real understanding of economics" that think Obama's plan is the way to go. In fact, one of them, Paul Krugman, won a Nobel Prize in Economics - and I think Warren Buffett knows a thing or two about economics.

Personally, I'm not much of an economist - but I pay bills on time and carry zero debt (debit card, not credit card is the way to go these days). I'd love it if our government worked the same way and neither McCain nor Obama have a plan that does that - but Obama has a plan to at least TRY to pay for what he proposes, unlike McCain and the GOP who spend first and then just put it on our national tab.

We should hang out. I miss good discussions with smart people I disagree with. Any chance you might be going to Colorado this winter?

Midnight Oil said...

Ha, not quite the same as saying a "real America." But hey, go ahead and twist my words. it's what you Libs do best. ;)

And no, I can't get behind McCain's plans, either. When have you hear me touting his excellence? He is merely the lesser of two evils.

I can't explain the Buffet thing, other than he's a liberal and his desire to see a liberal in the presidency and crush on the man leads him to support Obama. Buffet clearly understands economics as they affect his own purse. So, not sure why he can't apply his knowledge to government. Same with Colin Powell. No big surprise. Smart people support Obama, they're just misguided. :P

And I'll take less spending and a national tab over more spending and the collapse of the international economy, at least until we get a real fiscal conservative in office to straighten things out.

I would love to come visit in Colorado. Can't take off work. We'll just have to settle for the reunion in December.

Mike said...

Hey Jefferoo sorry to burst your bubble but book smart and political smarts often bare little correlation. How so, because to be politically smart means to read, write about, discuss YOUR own ideas and others ideas of the day. It means turning on C-SPAN and off John Stewart or Stephen WhoCares. It means researching data and facts to formulate YOUR opinion for and against issues. At the base level of private society, where the surface of issued is scratched and then elevated, 3 to 1 there are more Conservative/Libertarian think tanks (AEI, Heritage, CATO, Calremont, Hoover, Heartland, etc...). There are many more conservative talk shows that encourage (note I didn't say promote) but encourage avenues towards fact checking and strong researching of issues. The same goes with all sorts of publications like books, the Weekley Standards of the world and so forth. Again, not to say that Fox News promotes honest, intellectual fairness through discussion, but why do you think it's almost always the #1 rated network? Why do you hear more conservatives and libertarians on the phone lines of C-SPAN on shows like Washington Journal (and watch it because you do). You see these trends because conservatives watch the news more. Why is that, partially because there is a work ethic involved to being a conservative and living a conservative life style each and everday (nothing is handed out to you, nothing given to you for your taking at your beck and whim).

A libertarian professor at Brown did a study and analysis on this topic of uniformed voters and liberals vs. conservatives a while back and found what I am saying. Yes, every side has uninformed voters. But in a debate of political smarts, I am putting the edge on the right.

Midnight Oil said...

Thank you, Mike. I couldn't agree with you more.